NEW HAVAMAL TRANSLATION NOW AVAILABLE! ...Now you can read Odin's Words in full, raw and uncensored!

Buy YOUR COPY of my Uncensored and Unabridged Heathen Translation of the Hávamál on Amazon, HERE.

Sunday, July 20, 2014

What is the "blank rune"?

One common fad which has become popular among rune-enthusiasts in recent years has been the introduction of a "blank rune" - it's actually a sketchy new-age phenomenon starting in the 1980s when wooden rune tiles became widely marketed to "wiccan" and "spiritualist" audiences as an alternative form of divination, marketed much like Tarot cards. This "blank rune" has only ever been added to the common Gothic or "Elder" Futhark rune tile sets, to bring the total number of runes from 24 to 25.

You may have seen some books or websites that mention this "blank rune", calling it the "Wyrd rune" or even "Odin's rune". This itself is a big clue that the author is NOT an authority on runes, and probably has no clue what they're talking about. Whether you're referencing the Poetic or Prose Eddas or any other ancient source of Norse lore, a rune is always a symbol, an abstract idea, a mystery. The rune is the symbol itself, NOT the token or object that it's carved on. Therefore, a "blank rune" is no rune at all, but merely a blank stone or wood tile. And such blank tiles were never used in runic divination by the Norse or other Germanic peoples.

The reality is, the "Elder" Futhark never contained a 25th rune, and there is no evidence that Norsemen or Germans carried blank rune tiles either. They carved runes into staves, or hand-cut sections of tree branches, according to the Roman historian Tacitus. If they lost a rune stave, there were plenty of trees and dead wood around where they could cut out and carve a new one - no need to carry spares.

So who invented this fake "blank rune"?

The concept of a blank rune was invented by Ralph Blum, who up until 1982 was a virtually unknown New Age author and UFO novelist of Jewish origins, with absolutely NO prior knowledge of runes or Norse culture, history, or mythology. That year, 1982, was when Blum chanced upon a New-Age goldmine - he claims he got a set of handmade "Elder" Futhark wood tiles in England back in the 1970s, and then ignored them for several years, until one day he found them again and started playing with them. It happened that the set contained a blank 25th tile, probably a spare, in case one of the runes got lost. And not knowing anything about this or any other Futhark, Blum assumed the last tile was some sort of mysterious blank rune with deep mystical meanings, and sorted all 25 tiles into a 5x5 grid, including the blank tile. He proceeded to write a highly watered-down guide to runic divination called The Book of Runes that same year, based on this misguided interpretation.

Blum actually admits he got most of his "rune meanings" not from any authentic Scandinavian or Germanic source, but of all things, from the I-Ching system of Chinese Taoist divination! And it wasn't even the real I-Ching he used, but only the cheesy psycho-babble dime-store translations that were common in magic shops 1982. Nowadays he claims to also be a "cultural anthropologist" and even a "cancer expert" (just try looking him up on the internet, neither claim has any CV to back it up, much less a college degree, let alone an M.D.!) Has he cured cancer yet? Don't hold your breath.

The biggest fraud he invented was the infamous "blank rune". He claimed that there had once been a blank rune tile, with no rune written on it, used by the Vikings and other ancient Germanic peoples along with the 24 Elder Futhark, to represent Odin on the one hand, and the unknown, or fate, on the other. This blank rune is not only a baseless fraud (that was shamelessly mass-marketed as "ancient Viking spirituality"), it's not even a rune at all. A rune by definition is a symbol, not the absence of any symbol. A blank stone or tile is NOT a rune, it's simply a blank stone or tile, nothing more or less. And the symbolism he attributed to his "blank rune" is unnecessary anyway - The "Elder" Futhark already has an "Odin's rune" (Ansuz) and a rune of fate (Naudhiz), as well as a rune of the unknown (Perthro). There's no need for a "blank rune" to represent any of these meanings.

But even ignoring his use of a bogus blank 25th rune, Blum also got the order of the other 24 runes completely wrong as well! He starts the Elder Futhark with Mannaz, which is historically one of the last runes in the series. Had he looked at even one photo of an ancient Futhark inscription, he would have seen the proper order. The sequence always begins with Fehu, NOT Mannaz as Blum claims. Even in the "Younger", Anglo-Saxon, and Armanen rune systems, the first rune is always Fa/Fehu. The sequence runs Fehu-Uruz-Thurisaz-Ansuz-Raidho-Kenaz, which taken in shorthand spells F-U-T-H-A-R-K, hence the name by which the runic alphabet is known. The Mannaz rune doesn't appear until much later in the sequence. A bit like how in modern English we speak of children learning their A-B-C's (after the first letters in the English alphabet), but never their "M-N-O's" because the system doesn't start with M (although unlike modern alphabets, the Futhark were also symbols of magick and spiritual power, not just a plain writing system).

Ignorance is not an excuse once you know better.

Furthermore, despite its alternative names, Ralph Blum actually promoted the use of the blank rune (even after learning it wasn't an actual rune) for reasons that have nothing to do with either Odin or the concept of Wyrd (destiny). He wanted to bring the number of runes to 25 based on his own obsession with square numbers and the I-Ching. The I-Ching contains 64 "hexagrams" which are really different binary combinations of the 8 basic "trigrams" representing the elements of nature. Blum intended his blank rune to be part of a new system of 25 runes which resulted from different binary combinations of his own 5 "elements" (Aristotle's 4 elements of earth, fire, air and water, plus chi which Blum of course fondly borrowed from Chinese sources).

Not that there's anything wrong per se with Chinese occultism or the I-Ching. Being a true rune master does NOT imply racism or intolerance/denigration of other cultures and traditions. But if you're claiming to write a book about Nordic runes, and marketing it as "Viking spirituality", it's more than a bit dishonest to completely ignore the true historical meanings of those runes, and invent false claims about them based on your understanding of a totally unrelated magical system than isn't even remotely Nordic to begin with.

In addition, Blum also invented some rather strange new-age meanings for the runes that have ZERO basis in either written or oral Germanic tradition, from claiming that the rune Thurisaz is about contemplation and inaction (when it historically symbolized Thor and the giants, and therefore unflinching and even possibly violent action), to the bizarre allegation that Ansuz refers to the deceiver Loki, rather than being associated with Odin, the God of true and wise speech.

Blum didn't stop there. Apparently the pseudo-rune-literature business proved quite lucrative for him, and since then he's published no less than six other highly misleading books about runes (most of which are basically the typical pop-psychology New Age BS repackaged in a runic cover - his book Serenity Runes even rips off the "serenity prayer" from Alcoholics Anonymous!) And his original misleading Book of Runes is still in print, every 5 years or so a special "anniversary edition" comes out in fancy faux-leather hardcover, with gold-embossed runes all around the edges to give it a deceptive veneer of authority.

It seems any time you take a current "spiritualist" fad and repackage it as "runic" or "Viking" you will inevitably get a bunch of self-proclaimed "witches" and Harry Potter fans buying your book. But while he popularized runes superficially, Blum has, at the very least, caused a huge amount of confusion and done enormous damage to the reputation of runes as an effective and serious magickal system. Now many people pick up one of his books, read it, and think they know all about runes and ancient rune magick, when they are merely on a wild goose chase. And runes - in the imagination of those truly interested in serious magick - end up looking like just another cheesy commercialized fad. Blum doesn't teach you the real meanings of the runes, he teaches a shallow New-Age mockery of them based on his own personal whims.

Real rune rows come in 3's, not 5's.

All four major rune systems are ultimately based on a multiples of 3, not multiples of 5. The "Elder" Futhark is divided into three rows of eight runes each, called Aetts (or eights). While some have questioned that the old Norse ever used such a division scheme, it is in line with the ancient Norse/Germanic concept of the cosmos, life, and nature essentially being triple-phased. The Anglo-Saxon Futhorc has up to 33 runes in some versions, another multiple of 3. The Armanen contains 18 runes, yet another multiple of 3 (most of which are identical to those of the "Younger" Futhark). Although the "Younger" Futhark typically contains 16 runes, and therefore is not divisible by 3, most Runologists and Old Norse linguists believe it was once either 18 or 15 (there are enough variant runes in different regional inscriptions of this system, which may or may not be equivalents of others, to leave open either possibility).

By contrast, Ralph Blum takes the 24 "Elder" Futhark runes, adds in his "blank rune" for a total of 25, and then divides them up into 5 groupings containing 5 runes each. Not only is this totally un-historical, it also completely divorces the runes from one of the fundamental beliefs in Germanic cosmology - that everything in life, every cycle, every process, is three-phased. There are three phases in everything: Arising, Being, and Passing Away towards a new Arising. Hence why there are also three Norns, or Goddesses of "fate" in Norse/Germanic cosmology: Urðr (that which Was), Verðandi (that which is Becoming) and Skuld (that which May Become). There were three co-equal classes in ancient proto-Germanic society (farmers, warriors, and priests/mystics). And so on. Not a single mention of "fives" or even of the number five having any sacred meaning in Germanic Lore!

Now I still hear some people claim that they have gotten good results in their own lives from using the "blank rune" in divination and forecasting. There's no shortage of books and websites (usually with a very obvious "wiccan" or "new-age" slant) that explain how to use it for personal growth, mending broken hearts, changing your career path, curing addictions, finding your guardian angel, getting back at a bad boss, and just about everything else under the sun (like most hoaxes, and unlike any real rune, it's rumored to cure whatever ails you). If that works for you, fine, go for it. However, also know that you're practicing something that has no runic basis, has nothing to do with the Vikings, Teutons, Goths, or the Eddas and Sagas, and was invented in 1982 by a new-age huckster who had no knowledge of actual historical Rune rows, Rune meanings, or real Rune Magick as it was practiced by the Germanic peoples many centuries ago.

If on the other hand you want to practice real, dynamic and powerful Rune Magick like the revered rune masters and skalds of old, then whatever rune system you use, do NOT use a blank tile for rune casting. If you have a rune set that includes it, keep it locked away as a spare, to carve in case you lose one of the actual rune tiles. But if your rune set came with one of those horribly misleading books by Ralph Blum or other fad authors, chuck the book in the trash, you're better off not reading it, so you won't have to waste time unlearning all of its wrong information and false meanings.

There are much better books on Runes and Rune Magick out there, look here for a brief list.


  1. Replies
    1. You're welcome! I intend this post to benefit people who are looking into runes, so they can cut through all the confusion by scammers and bad authors, and find real information on rune magick.

      Runes are definitely worth study for spiritual seeker, but there are too few good books about them (translations of Guido von List, Peryt Shou, and Friedrich Marby are hard to come by) and there are far too many books of either the dry, detached academic sort, or total wishy-washy nonsense like what you get with Ralph Blum and his "blank rune".

  2. I agree with you 100%.I have seen way too much "magik" rune garbage sold to people who know nothing except what the guy at the magic store told them.I think its pretty funny when people show me their tattoos featuring random letters of the Elder Futhark adorning a Chinese dragon or some other nonsense...good for a chuckle.I think I have seen this writing style before on Sunnyway...same person?

    1. No, I am not Sunnyway. Ironically, Sunnyway itself is a website promoting a lot of strange non-runic ideas, which make even Ralph Blum look ordinary. They seem to have this bizarre obsession with menstrual blood and using it in all sorts of rituals, which isn't a Runic or Germanic practice at all. There's absolutely zero mention of it in any of the Lore, or in any Indo-European tradition for that matter. It's a new-age thing invented by kabbalists like Aleister Crowley, and copied by Gerald Gardner. That makes me think Sunnyway is not culturally honest rune site, but rather a site sun by extreme wiccans and perhaps Crowley/OTO followers who want to have their "menstrual moon cake" and eat it too, all while hiding it under a runic cloak. Perhaps a few of them are followers of Stephen Flowers' (less publicized) Setian/Goetic masochism practices. Again, not Runic, and in fact based on utterly foreign and unrelated traditions, including some whose spirit runs contrary to Runic paths.

  3. Thanks for explaining that, I was confused why there were two runes apparently meaning Odin! Thanks!

  4. Hey. Im new to all this. Are you saying stephen flowers' galdrabok is not worth using? What would you recommend for true germanic magic sources?

    1. I don't think I've commented on Stephen Flowers' translation of the Galdrabok specifically. This post doesn't evendiscuss Flowers. As for the Galdrabok, it isn't his work, he simply translated it, but even if he was an accurate translator and loyal to a Heathen 'Weltanschauung' (he is NOT), the Galdrabok still is not a primary source for Germanic Magick because it's a Christian-era (late medieval-early Renaissance) document. Galdrabok contains a mix of symbols from many sources, not all of them Germanic. Sadly Flowers is the only translator for a number of rare Germanic texts, including many that are far more critical than the Galdrabok, so I have to include a few of his translations on my reading lists for now... but I intend to change that in the future.

      Good sources to read would be the Elder Edda and the Volsunga Saga (there are at least some okay translations of those available; I plan to publish my own translation of the Havamal this year, which will be far more accurate than previous translations).

      If you want a concise modern source that references and quotes all the major ancient sources you need to know, do an internet search for "Heathen Magic: An Irminic Perspective" by Steve Anthonijsz. It's a free article and covers all the major areas in Heathen Magick, including Runes, Galdr, shamanic practices (Spa, Seidhr, etc.), traditional Germanic "witchcraft" (Hagzusa) and much more. It's probably the best intro to Germanic Magick and religion there is.

      I also have a couple of reading lists for Germanic Magick practices.

      Here's a Runic reading list:

      And here's a much longer one on Indo-European culture that includes Germanic Magick practices:

      These books will all be useful in getting a well-rounded view of Germanic Magick and genuine Runic traditions.

    2. Your post from dec 2017: "Perhaps a few of them are followers of Stephen Flowers' (less publicized) Setian/Goetic masochism practices. Again, not Runic, and in fact based on utterly foreign and unrelated traditions, including some whose spirit runs contrary to Runic paths." I was seeking clarification on how i read the statement.

    3. Flowers has indeed introduced a lot of material in his course work "Nine Doors of Midgard" which is loaded with non-Indo-European and non-Runic concepts. He is still a high priest in the Temple of Set and pushes satanic/setian and hermetic concepts in that course (including satanist and setian books in the "self-study" portions), as well as his more advanced Rune books. He also deals a lot with sado-masochism and has a lot of bizarre and anti-Odinic content in his "Red Runa" and "Black Runa" books. However I have not commented specifically on his Galdrabok translation.

      If someone else more dedicated to authentic Indo-European Heathenry had translated all the ancient texts that Flowers has translated, I'd advocate ignoring him altogether. Unfortunately, many of them currently have had no other English translation done. I aim to rectify this problem in the next few years.

  5. I was looking at your armanen runes and noticed your graphics had some faint lines on them like erase marks or something. Or maybe a root image cgi over. Either way it looks like you have a fluid, possibly measured formula for your runes. Would you be willing to share some of yoir technique?

    1. If you don't mind can you email me at your convenience? id like to discuss some techniques and such that would possibly not be appropriate here. Thanks.

    2. They are formed from the radii of a hexagon. As per the design in Master Rudolf's books, which were also used by Yogi Siegfried.