NEW HAVAMAL TRANSLATION NOW AVAILABLE! ...Now you can read Odin's Words in full, raw and uncensored!

Buy YOUR COPY of my Uncensored and Unabridged Heathen Translation of the Hávamál on Amazon, HERE.

Monday, July 28, 2014

Ægishjálmur: The Helm of Awe - what does it truly mean?

One common runic symbol seen in runic or northern occult circles (not a rune itself, but a derivative of runes) is the Ægishjálmur, or Helm of Awe. Some people even go so far as to get it tattooed on their arm, without really understanding what it is about.

What is it? Basically the Helm of Awe is an 8-branched radial symbol, known commonly as a "stave-rune". There are actually a number of different radial stave-runes or "Helms of Awe", each being an 8-fold repetition of a single rune. The most common one seen today (largely thanks to the survival of the Icelandic Sagas) is an 8-fold repetition of the Elder Futhark Algiz rune, with triple crossbars on each of the 8 copies. Since Algiz is basically a rune of protection (the branching prongs of the symbolic elk-horn keeping danger at bay), repeating the rune 8 times in all directions serves the purpose of blocking or evading attacks from all directions, both the obvious and the concealed. In this sense it may also be used by runenmeisteren as a powerful esoteric charm against malevolent psychic attacks.

What does it mean?

The name of this symbol is ægishjálmr, or Ægishjálmur, which literally means "helm of awe". An alternate translation is "helm of terror" in the sense of striking terror into one's attackers. It it mentioned in the sagas often in the context of a "shield of terror" or the "mask of  dread". Traditionally it was painted on the foreheads (some say it was even carved) of warriors to either confuse or strike fear into the hearts of foes.

The term Ægishjálmur may translate as a "helm" (Norse root Hjalmar, similar to German Helm or Helmut) but in all likelihood it did not refer to an actual helmet. It does not have the recognizable shape of a helmet, but rather a radial design like a spider web, or more accurately, like a pine tree viewed from the top, with the branches sorting out into a radial pattern.

The description of this object or symbol as a "helm" most likely originated in one of two ways: (1) first, as a bind-rune painted on circular wooden shields, with a radial pattern of symmetric Algiz runes arrayed around the central bushing, and (2) second, as a largely sorcery-based metaphysical protection for one's head (and thus one's life) rooted in the mysterious shamanic type of Norse magick known as seiðr  which also had analogues in Scythian and Getic traditions. Both theories have merit, and it is possible that the real history of this symbol took some input from both realms of Germanic magick. The rune-origin and seiðr -origin theories are here explored.

The Runic Theory

One of the most obvious ways to arrive at the construction of the Ægishjálmur  is to use runes. In this case, the rune in question is suggested by most scholars to be the "Elder" Futhark rune Algiz or Algir, representing either an Elk due to its pronged antler-like shape, or the obscure legendary plant known as "elk-sedge" which was rumored to be similarly spiky. The stave of the Algiz rune is then extended and adorned with three cross-bars, signifying augmentation or amplification of a particular energy in Icelandic Galdrastafir magick. Originally the angular straight branches of Algiz may have been retained in the Ægishjálmur as they are in a couple of simpler "guarding staves". However by the time this stave was written down in the late medieval Grimoires of Iceland's Christian era, the "forks" had become curved like a pitchfork. The angular "pitchfork" staves in other symbols like the Vegvísir may have evolved from these.

Algiz rune

The shape of Algiz, as you may already know, also resembles the Maðr rune in the Younger Futhark, as well as the Armanen Man rune, both of which refer to man, masculinity, strength, vitality, augmentation of self, and increase in magickal powers. Though none of these meanings are necessarily "military" in the same sense as Algiz being symbolic of a weapon, the Elk's antlers, they do reflect a similar concern with strength, courage, and a good defense, whether magickal or physical. Though not the same rune as Algiz (their "Elder" Futhark equivalent is, oddly enough, the twin-staved Mannaz), they do have the same symbol-shape and thus point to a similar upward or outward-expanding assertive nature.

"Primitive" form of the symbol with straight branches,
commonly seen printed on heathen T-shirts

Interestingly, the Ægishjálmur  appears in one of the oldest Norse sagas, the Volsunga saga, whose settings are based not in Iceland or Denmark, but deep in Continental Germanic lands, which in Bronze Age times extended far east of Germanic regions today. The entire realms of the Goths, Rugii, and Teutons once extended out past modern Poland into the regions today part of Ukraine and Russia, and their neolithic ancestors even had links with the Caspian Sea and Greater Iranid peoples, millennia before Magyars, Avars, and Khazar Turks intruded into the Volga region and violently wrenched the North and South solar cultures apart. The early generations of the Volsung clan lived in this region of Dacia or Dahaea, traversing modern Ukraine and Romania, which was inevitably retconned to "Hun-land" in later re-tellings of the saga before it was written down.

If this is the case, as the myths seem to strongly indicate, then not only are the trappings of Germanic culture likely older than a "Germanic" identity, they may well have primal Aryan origins. Indeed, the motif of the Ægishjálmur 's simpler "cousin", the four-spoked Korshjálmur or "cross-helm", is almost identical to elements of solar patterns seen on Persian, Armenian and Kurdish woven dreamcatchers and some village rugs, which indicates a common cultural origin. This symbol is also a sunwheel or sun-cross variant, which links it to even more powerful and more misunderstood solar symbols, all of which long predate Christianity.

Similar pattern in Armenian or Persian rug

In that case, the Ægishjálmur being a runic-derived symbol is not only likely - it may actually be the other way around - that some runic symbols like Algiz were derived from the Ægishjálmur  or at least shared a common origin! Remember, while the runes themselves - the energies and magickal principles embodied in the various runic symbols - are held to be Odin's discovery in times "before men had the ability to reason", nevertheless the actual symbols themselves that we call "runes" today have evolved, and some may indeed have been derived from older solar symbols. We are not dogmatists about the precise "originality" or "continuity" of the outer symbols themselves (though they do tell us much about the "runes" or secret powers they represent even by their shape). Maybe they predate the Ægishjálmur , or maybe it predates them. Either way, the ultimate root-nature of the transcendent runes themselves, that is, the creative energies behind the symbols, is not in doubt, and our wisdom and skill in magick is not diminished in the slightest.

The idea of Ægishjálmur being a combination of 8 radially arranged Algiz runes with amplifying triple-cross lines and a central circle, is not far-fetched at all - and being essentially a magickal symbol for invincibility in battle, it is definitely related in purpose to the reported nature of Algiz, since the Anglo-Saxon rune poem, which renders Algiz as Eolh, or the Elk,  indicates this rune represents a prickly and dangerous thing never to be touched:

The Eolh-sedge is mostly to be found in marshes;
it grows in the water and makes a ghastly wound,
covering with blood every warrior who touches it.

Quite a terrible "sedge" indeed. And the Elk-sedge is thus a primally appropriate motif for the basic units of the Helm of Awe, such that composing the symbol from these Algiz or Eolh runes will strike fear into all foes, such that their wounds in battle will be ghastly and they will flee in fear of massive blood loss.

A person carving this symbol into any sort of sacred object in ancient times, or even into their own flesh, would have to be a warrior or at least on in severe need of a warding-spell to drive away all who approached them. Of course today there are millions of cheap mass-produced amulets for sale on the internet featuring the Ægishjálmur or the Algiz rune, not carved or Galdr-enchanted, but simply cast in pewter or some nameless "white metal", which show no respect for this deadly-serious martial past. But merely buying and wearing one of these, does not make one a master of either the rune or the Ægishjálmur's power, just like buying and wearing a Valknut medallion does not make one either an Odinist, a warrior, or even one who is prepared to become a warrior, face death and go to Valhalla to fulfill their honor.

It could theoretically be possible to also construct an Ægishjálmur from Maðr  or Man runes, though the distinction would be moot to all but the carver or painter of the symbol who chanted the name of Man rather than Algiz, as their original angular forms are visually identical. 

The Seiðr Theory

If the "Helm of Awe" referred to a metaphysical "helmet" of invisible magick, anchored to the physical world by the radial symbol, it would indeed be appropriate for this to be a seiðr construction. As in the Sagas, the Helm is typically painted in the center of the forehead, in the spot where many old Aryan traditions, both northern and southern, tend to depict the Third Eye in their mystical iconography. In that sense, it can be said to tap into some of the most primal energies of the universe through one's Third Eye, and then project an activation of pure living force (which come call the Od or Odic force) to either form a healing aura, or one of pure terror, depending on the intent and emotion channeled.

The precise workings of seiðr are largely lost to time, though there are reports of modern magickal groups attempting a reconstruction of the practice, after some members' long years of study in related Indo-European disciplines.

Seiðr  itself, however, had many different uses. It could be used to both help and harm. Traditionally among Viking-age warriors and rune-masters however, it was feared and even despised as a "dark art" used by malevolent witches to possess the target's mind and trap them in webs of forgetfulness, delusion, or terror. they were alleged to create illusions of wraiths or visions of disaster so terrifying that the victim often became insane, suicidal, or simply lost the will to live.


Ráðumk þér Loddfáfnir
en þú ráð nemir
njóta mundu ef þú nemr
þér munu góð ef þú getr
fjölkunnigri konu
skalattu í faðmi sofa
svá at hon lyki þik liðum

I advise you, Loddfafnir,
to take my advice;
you would benefit, it you took it,
good will come to you, if you get it:
the woman skilled in magic,

in her embrace you must not sleep
such that she locks you in her limbs -
Hon svá gørir
at þú gáir eigi
þings né þjóðans máls
mat þú villat
né mannskis gaman
ferr þú sorgafullr at sofa

- she will make sure
that you heed not
Thing's nor king's words;
food you will not desire
nor mankind's joys;
you fall sorrowfully to sleep.

However, not all applications of seiðr  were harmful or malevolent to the subject.  Ægishjálmur  in particular was intended as a sacred stave or protection for the warrior, to strike terror into his enemies and make him utterly fearless of the possibility of his own death, thus all but guaranteeing him absolute victory. Nevertheless, Ægishjálmur is, like nearly all effective magick, very much a "dual-use technology". It can be used to protect a loved one from harm, but it can also be used to cause great harm to others in an unprovoked attack. Much like the honor-combat tradition of Holmganga was intended to prevent the decay of society through dishonor, slander and tribal feuds, but could also be abused by thuggish individuals to "legally" steal land and possessions from elderly or poor farmers. Eventually, much like this led to Holmganga being banned in Norway, the abuse of seiðr apparently led to its instruction being highly restricted by the Viking age, aside from its later suppression by Christianity - and very little of it was passed down beyond the 13th century CE.

The Ægishjálmur belongs to a special type of seiðr practice known to the Vikings-age Norse as sjónhverfing, a colorful term which translates as "sight-deceiving" or illusion charms. In this method, the seiðr -practitioner warps the mind of their target so that they believe illusions to be real, or fail to see things for what they are. This art was used to create lifelike illusions and hide one thing behind an illusion of something else, particularly in hiding a hunted man from his pursuers. In Iceland, unlike in mainland Scandinavia, this art would have had to be especially potent if practiced outdoors, due to the lack of tree cover making concealment in the guise of nearby objects very problematic. The art of "sight-deceiving" doe not so much make one invisible as it hides them in plain sight, in the guise of various easily overlooked objects - a bit like how Frodo's cloak in The Lord of the Rings does not actually make him invisible, but rather takes on the mottled and worn appearance of a typical rock when used to hide its wearer, thus making him impossible for foes to tell him apart from any of the millions of small boulders in the area. The base-structure of this magickal ability may have been a sort of hypnosis, an art that was already understood and practiced for thousands of years. Indeed, much like hypnosis, it was possible to counteract the silent spells of a seiðr-witch by depriving her of her sight, or at least separate her sufficiently from the subject of her spell that she was not able to see him, due to natural barriers and terrain and such. Also, the effect of this illusion-based form of seiðr  faded when the subject (or the victim, depending on the usage of seiðr  bring practiced) was out of sight of the seiðr-practitioner.

The Eyrbyggja saga, which was likely compiled and evolved over several centuries, mentions this usage of seiðr for deception (chapter 20). Katla, one of the most renowned seiðr -women in all of Iceland's history, wished to rescue her son Oddur, who had gotten involved in some underhanded quarrels over a neighbor's property, and fled the murderous wrath of a band of armed men. As the men surrounded her house, Katla told Oddur to sit beside her motionless, while she sat working her spinning wheel. The men searched the house high and low, but saw nothing near Katla but her spinning wheel and weaver's distaff. After going off to look elsewhere, they returned again to find Katla outside on her porch; she was actually combing Oddur's hair, but her seiðr  gave them the illusion  that she was merely grooming her goat. They returned a third time and then Oddur was collapsed in a pile of ashes by the home's fire pit, and their eyes deceived them that Katla's boar was sleeping there. Each time they left the house, they realized that what they had just seen - the distaff, the goat, the boar - had not been present in the house, or at least in the same spot, the previous time they had paid her a visit, and they began to suspect that they had been duped. They also suspected that Katla was wise to their realizations, since she was resorting to a different sort of deception each time. Finally the men brought along Geirríðr, another skilled seiðr-woman whom Katla despised and described as a troll, to aid them in uncovering the deceptions and finding Oddur. When Katla saw Geirríðr through her window, she knew that sjónhverfing or "deceiving the sight" would not be an effective defense any longer. Geirríðr popped a seal-skin bag over Katla's head, covering her eyes and immediately disabling her magick. They found and hanged Oddur, and Katla was also accused of property damage to their lands and stoned to death.

A similar magickal technique, and one that may be directly related to the Ægishjálmur, was the spell called the huliðshjálmur, the Helm of hiding, which made one invisible to enemies. The ritual for the huliðshjálmur could vary, from putting your hands on top of the subject's head as if putting a helmet on their head, to throwing possibly psychoactive powders over them to slow down their heart rate and movement, and there may have been a variety of other means. Though not referred to as a helmet even in a mystical sense, the Vatnsdoela saga (chapter 44) mentions that the special pointed hood worn by the seið-master or mistress, resembling the pointed caps of the Scythians and Sarmatians, was said to have the power to make others invisible while the seið-master was wearing it.

Therefore, the usage of the Ægishjálmur symbol may have been as a protective "sigil" painted on a person's head as a magickal "helmet" to strike dread into his foes and make their hands and weapon strikes unsteady so that they miss his head, without the spell needing to actually function as deflective armor. Much like the huliðshjálmur spell which uses "deception of sight" to make the user invisible, the Ægishjálmur can be used to activate illusions which make them appear mighty and terrifying to all that view them, commanding the immediate loyalty of friends and causing foes to cower or run.

The most famous appearance of the Ægishjálmur is in the legendaryVolsunga saga, chapter 18:

Enn mælti Fáfnir: "Ek bar ægishjálm yfir öllu fólki, síðan ek lá á arfi míns bróður, ok svá fnyýta ek eitri alla vega frá mér í brott, at engi þorði at koma i nánd mér, ok engi vánm hræddumst ek, ok aldri fann ek svá margan mann fyrir mér, at ek þættumst eigi miklu sterkari, en allir váru hræddir við mik."

Sigurðr mælti: "Sá ægishjálmr, er þú sagðir frá, gefr fám sigr, því at hverr sá, er með mörgum kemr, má þat finna eitthvert sinn, at engi er einna hvatastr."

[And Fáfnir said, "An 
ægishjálm I bore up before all folk, after that I brooded over the heritage of my brother, and on every side did I spout out poison, so that none dared come near me, and of no weapon was I afraid, nor had I ever seen so many men before me, and yet deemed myself stronger than them all; for all men were greatly afraid of me."

Sigurd said, "Such an 
ægishjálmr, few will by means of it gain a likewise victory, for whoever comes among many shall one day find that no one man is by so far in excess the mightiest of all."]

Some believe that Fáfnir, the legendary warrior who transformed into a dragon due to the curse of Andvari's gold, as a young man had worn the Ægishjálmur symbol on his forehead, between his eyes.

By the late Viking Age, with the increasing presence of organized Christianity, the awe-inspiring spells of seiðr  had been driven far underground. But certain types of magick were still practiced by Icelandic vitkar or wizards, and this was often considered less "foul" by churchmen than the supposed abomination of a woman practicing magick, for the Christian doctrine of fear towards spiritually powerful women as "evil temptresses" were already infamous in Europe. The male vitkar, on the other hand, gradually became amalgamated with the figures the Church syncretistically painted as "good wizards" to make itself more palatable to a magickal culture, such as Santa Claus and Jesus Christ himself. However the belief in the Ægishjálmur lived on, being reinterpreted as a Galdr-stave and hence a runic symbol, thus less obviously seiðr-related and more akin to the indigenous scripts of Nordic countries, and thus far harder to excise from the cultural soul of the people. The Viking vitkar believed that the symbol should be cut into lead or copper, stained, and then pressed between one's eyebrows (in which case it would need to be rather small), then the user would recite the words "Ægishjalm eg ber milli bruna mjer," ("Ægishjalm I carry between my brows"). Victory in battle, or at least a severe demoralizing blow to the enemy, was then assured.

One interesting fact is that the "helm of awe" came to be understood as representing a physical object, a helmet worn on the head - while not an actual helmet, it was likely either worn on the head with a sort of woven chain-coif, as one sees some of the elves wear in The Lord of The Rings, or simply used as a "stamp" of sorts to press a temporary impression hard into one's forehead. It also may have been painted on shields, as a "helm" could also mean a shelter or a shield against the blows of hostile forces. In this guise, the Ægishjálmur was sometimes rumored to bestow not just awe, but also depending on the usage, invisibility (and therefore invincibility) upon the wearer. Rather than literal invisibility, it might mean invisibility or untrackability of one's movements, making your enemy unable to see, predict, or understand your fighting moves and react to them until it is too late.

Richard Wagner borrowed the idea of the "Helm of Awe" as well. In his Ring Cycle, which was heavily influenced by the Volsunga saga, the Ægishjálmur appears in the guise of an actual helmet, the Tarnhelm, and it not only makes the wearer feared in battle and invisible, but also enables him to shape-shift into terrifying creatures as Fáfnir did, and even to travel great distances in an instant - indicating that Wagner may have been one of the first modern people to depict teleportation in his art. Whether the ancient Norse believed the Ægishjálmur (or something similar) conferred any such instant-travel ability is unknown, though it is possible that such abilities, or at least their illusion, were within the real of highly advanced seiðr  masters.

It must be emphasized, however, that the  Ægishjálmur  is primarily for defense or war. While one tends to see many online listings of cheap pewter Ægishjálmur talismans for sale, labeled "irresistibility in battle", I must emphasize the "battle" part here. Ægishjálmur is not is a magickal symbol for making one irresistible in any other sense, such as the oft-mistaken assumption that is also makes you irresistible in love (there are runes and bind-runes for that however, though I do not teach them freely to just anyone as they are very dangerous if abused). Also, while many online sellers offer "cute" chrome-plated pendants with an Ægishjálmur  surrounded by a ring of "Elder" Futhark runes, there is no evidence that they were ever used together historically (though given its simple symmetric design, the Ægishjálmur may indeed be that old), and there is also no proof that Ægishjálmur was worn around the neck as a necklace. In any case, the Ægishjálmur is a spell to make one irresistible in battle, not in the bedroom.

There is the question of whether the Helm of Awe was actually worn as a talisman on the forehead at all, or whether it was actually tattooed. While there are no archaeological hints of tattooing this symbol, no "bog bodies" and such with Ægishjálmur tattoos on their skin, there is also nothing to indicate that this idea was in any way shunned or disregarded by Norse warriors. So if you want to get one tattooed, that is your call. In our time it's probably not the best idea to put it on your forehead though, unless you want to be striking fear (or just uneasiness) into everyone that looks at you.

If you do get this symbol tattooed on your skin, or take the easier step of buying one of the many different styles of "Helm of Awe" pendants or talismans out there on ebay, etsy and so forth, don't panic - even though this is the "Helm of Terror", it's mainly a protective symbol against enemies and is not known to have any directly harmful effects of symbolism towards non-belligerents. It's not strictly a warrior symbol, as in the Lore it was used in other contexts too, such as Katla protecting her son. However it is a sign that you are not afraid to fight for what is yours. The equally popular Valknut, on the other hand, should probably be avoided as a tattoo design for the vast majority of people. It was carved into the chests of slain warriors as a mark of Odin and of their journey to Valhalla to train and fight in his army of heroes against the destructive forces of chaos when Ragnarok comes- a noble fate only reserved for those who fell in battle, rather than dying of natural causes. However it follows as a corollary that warriors who used this symbol in life, considering themselves followers of the way of Einherjar, the most difficult of the Odinic paths, and they fully accepted and indeed perhaps welcomed the possibility of dying a very violent and painful death. 



  1. Thinking seriously of getting the Aegishjalmur as a tattoo (first one!) so this info is very useful thanks :)

  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

  3. lol first of all the original helm of awe symbol is 4 stave-runes formed into a cross. Second, Algiz-rune does help in luck, whether it is in love or battle, whatever you throws it at it will help you.

    1. The cross-stave or Kors-hjalmur was indeed a more "primitive" version. However this is not the typical form seen today.

      As for your view on Algiz, with all due respect, it is very "catch-all" and eclectic with zero cultural context. And you're missing the point. I said that the Ægishjálmur is for battle not love, I was not referring to the Algiz rune.

      However there's no evidence for even the Algiz rune being a rune of love. The only mention of it in ANY ancient Runelore is in the Anglo-Saxon rune poem, where it the only mention of it connects it to a thorny marsh plant which seems to lethally wound anyone who touches it. Nothing there about "luck" in "whatever you throw at it". Nothing about using it for "love" either. Are you sure you're not just copying Ralph Blum or every other psychobabble "every rune does everything" New Age author?

    2. Cyrus the strong you seem wise yet your words seem to contain a certain potency that could affect others minds to a point where one idea and expierence is limited I caution you. But I also thank your some insight on the matter it was well informative

    3. Thank you for your sincere input. I appreciate your caution and compliments.

  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

  5. I was wondering if i can have this tattoo on my ankle? Will it be an offensive area? looking forward your reply,
    many wishes!

    1. Sure you can. In the Lore, the Helm of Awe was apparently not tattooed permanently, but painted on the forehead or "stamped" on it using twigs or a raised pendant coated in paint. However, neither were runes tattooed in the Old Times, but that does not mean there's anything wrong with tattooing them.

      Putting it on the ankle isn't "offensive" per se, it's just a bit unusual considering anything labeled a "helm" or resembling a shield usually is associated with the head or upper body. On the other hand if you are a kickboxer or involved in some other martial art that involves a lot of kicks or footwork, it would make a lot of sense to have it on your ankle. The Ginfaxi symbol would be more common on legs or feet, as it was associated with wrestling.

      There's very little that can truly be considered "offensive" in runic spirituality, let alone Odinism/Asatru. As it has no commandments, no literal scripture, no infallibility, and no prophets (at least not in the semitic sense of the term). It really just depends on intent and context.

  6. Your work is really respectable and admirable!!!!! It is my pleasure to have a chance to read this blog. I have find a picture of helm of awe while many runes around as a circle outside the helm, and i am not quite understand it. I was wondering if there is a chance to send the picture to you and have a check? Or reply me here is fine as well, really appreciate, many many thanks!!

    1. Thanks for your interest, Qizya. It is for curious rune explorers yourself that I write this blog! I have seen many examples of the symbol you describe. It is usually a Helm of Awe with the 24 "Elder" Futhark runes arranged in a circle around it.

      This version with 24 runes around it is not purely historical (though separately, the runes and the Helm are), but is nevertheless very popular among both modern Heathens/Asatruars and other rune students. If you want to know the basic (reconstructed) meanings of the "Elder" 24 runes, check out my post on "The Elder Futhark". All of these runes are also present in the Anglo-Saxon Futhorc, which unlike the "Elder" rune row also has a surviving lore poem associated with it.

      Many of these runes are also present in the 18-rune Armanen Futharkh, which contains full exoteric AND esoteric meanings. It is basically a restoration of the 18 Odinic runes mentioned in the Havamal (which the Viking skalds tried to achieve, with partial success, in their 16-rune "Younger" Futhark), so in a sense it is the "Eldest" rune row, though it came into use fairly recently.

    2. Many many thanks for your reply. You are right about the reason that why i wanna get it on my ankle. It is such relieving that not being considered offensive. Many appreciate!
      Also thanks for your reply for the version with 24 runes, now i can totally understand it (Also read your other articles, brilliant!)
      by the way, do you think if it is possible to tattoo the version with runes, i know it is not purely historical, but it is really beautiful. I am so frustrating between the original version and 24 runes version.

      Again, appreciate for your patiently reply.
      Many Many Thanks, admirable work!


    3. Of course it is "possible". Plenty of tattoo artists can do it for you.

      It's your choice, not mine. I'm not a tattoo person myself so I don't have a suggestion, but if you are, then choose what speaks to you. If the 24 "Elder" runes are your preferred system for divination, meditation, carving, etc. and you want them tattooed, then that's fine. If you prefer to work with "Younger" or Armanen runes, then go with those. If you're not really into rune work at all then you might prefer the Helm of Awe without runes.

      As long as you know their meanings, it will make a good conversation subject. The meanings for all 4 major rune rows are up on this blog if you don't know them. Just don't be one of those clueless people who get a Helm of Awe, a Vegvisir, or a rune set tattooed and then can't explain what it is! I've met a few odd people like that, they get a tattoo because it "looks cool" but they have no idea what it is, and don't have a clue about rune names, Odin, or the Eddas. Very embarrassing.

  7. Lulz. Took a look at the Huld Manuscript, apparently the only existing source material for a pictorial version of the symbols Ægishjálmur and the Vegvísir. as soon as I saw the "Solomon's seal" on the page prior to them, it was obvious that both symbols are Enochian sigils, not Norse or Germanic runes.

    First page of sigils in the Huld manuscipt is instantly recognized as being composed of enochian sigils having nothing in common with Norse or Germanic runes. Big, big, big red flag!!!

    here is the page with "Solomon's seal" Uh, sorry folks, but Kabbalah and the mystery schools of the west that sprang up from bastardizing kabbalah have no connections what so ever to Norse or Germanic runes. Its pretty obvious that this Book of magic was written by someone dabbling in the western mysteries, possibly even a Rosicrucian sect like Crowly's Golden Dawn. This is western alchemy, not Norse or Germanic Runes/Rune magic.

    It really makes the symbols as seen on history channel"s Vikings and all the tattoos people are getting a bit ridiculous. Would love to hear literal references about Ægishjálmur and the Vegvísir from some one familiar with the sagas.

    1. Did you read the reference to the Volsunga Saga which mentions the Aegishjalmur? Or the Eyrbyggja saga, which hints at it? In this blog post I already break down why it's likely to be of Germanic origin. The basis is there in the Algiz and Madhr runes, and in those sagas. Of all the Huld Manuscript symbols, it's easily the most Runic of them. Vegvisir is a bit less clear, it may be somewhat influenced by Hermetica, though it too appears to have a mix of Germanic, Celtic, and Baltic elements to it, at least when you straighten out the curved lines. But Aegishjalmur and Vegvisir are not Enochian sigils. I've never seen them appear in Enochian grimoires.

      I don't doubt that the Huld manuscript is a late medieval or renaissance invention which uses a lot of Hermetic, "Enochian" and Kabbalistic sigils - but it's important to remember that those are not the only source of its stave-symbols. Huld is a mixture of symbols from many different magickal traditions. And yes, most of them are not related to Germanic runes, but at least a few are. And the Aegishjalmur and Vegvisir are unique to Iceland - to Huld, the Galdrabok, and Icelandic books that followed them. You don't find these two symbols in original Enochian or Kabbalah texts. Huld is a mishmash of different things so it can have an "Enochian" symbol on one page, and a late Nordic one on the next page, and so on.

      Also it's important to note that the Norwegians who first colonized Iceland (along with a large number of Irish thralls/slaves) had already started carving runes with curved branches similar to the ones in some of the Huld-staves, even before the Christian conversions and any interaction with "western mysteries" (which are really more like quasi-Romanized Middle Eastern mysteries). So not everything in the Huld manuscript is Runic, but a few of the more basic symbols like Aegishjalmur appear to be Runic in origin, rather than Kabbalistic. Like most of Icelandic magick, Huld contains some of this and some of that. There also appears to be some amount of Finno-Ugric or Baltic influence in some of the rake-shaped symbols on some of the staves, similar to the Slavic "hands of Bog" stave-symbols.

      So to assume that Huld is all one thing, can be misleading. While the red flag concern is valid, Huld is not a Kabbalah book, even despite things like Solomon Seals and Enochian sigils in a few places - it's a syncretism of symbols from various traditions, most of them imported from the Hermeticists in mainland Europe in the 1500s and 1600s, but also combined with some late medieval native Runic-derived staves of Iceland.

      As for the "Vikings" show, it's got a huge pile of inaccuracies and pandering even if you don't count the symbols and tattoos. I don't have a problem with people getting "Viking" tattoos, as long as they know what it means and if it's right for them. Once I met a fellow (well, just barely) who had a Vegvisir tattoo circled by the 24 Elder Futhark runes (which were never associated with it historically), but didn't know the name of the symbol or the names of the runes! He claimed it stood for "love, peace, and harmony" (the usually hippie BS), and was shocked to find out it's a stave allegedly used by battle-hardened warriors and sailors to avoid getting lost at sea. Then he got worried about the tattoo offending people...

      Most Indo-European traditions have no patience for self-imagined victimhood or getting "offended" over things so easily, and I told him I'm not offended. I just think it's unwise to get a tattoo without learning its true meaning, because nobody who knows Runes will ever take him seriously.

  8. This comment has been removed by the author.